I read part of an artical that you wrote about and you wrote about Marduk and Tiamat, first i'd like to say that im happy to see other people out there who at least know about them, but thats not why im writing you, i'd just like to say that you're a disgrace for trying to shove your beliefs down others throats, and you also fucked up alot of the information on how tiamat was used to create the earth, if i felt like typing.... ohhhhh....... about 15 pages i could further inform you of the use of tiamats body.

I'm a currently practicing celtic and have been for quite a few years, and i have done extensive research on ALL of the celtic gods, and i do know that you could possibly be wiccan in which case you're still wrong about how tiamat was used, i know this because wicca was derived from the celtic religion and i have studied quite a bit about their legends, not to mention i have many friends that are devote wiccans and have been studing their religion as i have mine.

Next time you want to ram your theories and beliefs down others throats think about how you're going to think when they do the same thing to you and say that there is no tiamat or marduk, never was, never will be and so on and so forth, if you dont try to change others beliefs and ideas and just learn to accept them, and just let them accept yours in return, i believe you will find life quite a bit less difficult and a bit more enjoyable, and i believe the gods would be a bit happier with humanity if everyone lived like that, even though not everyone believes the right theory, and neither you nor i have the proof that this planet, or anything else for that matter, was made out of tiamats rottings carcass.

I hope you take what i have said into concideration before you write another artical like that.

P.S. Feel free to reply with any thoughts you happen to have on this subject.



TMB:I responded: Huh?



Kevin answered:

You're able to use words like "misanthropic", and "misogynists" but all you have to say in reply to my email is "Huh?"? the closing on your email is about 10 times longer than the rest of it. if you want to reply with a question at least make it an answerable one



TMB:I responded: What?



Kevin did not respond.

I have read your article on Evolution and the discussion following with Adam. Your replies are unintelligent, idiotic, and childish. Somewhat like you claim the replies of the teen mothers to be.

You also state that scientists blindly follow science like a religion. Now we can tell you are the uneducated bitch that you bitch about. If you had any science in school you would know that scientists discredit theories and hypotheses all the time. They need 101% evidence supporting it, and the minute it is disproved, the hypothesis is changed. The whole point of hypotheses and experiments is to try and prove OR disprove them. One simple experiment that disproves a hypothesis discredits it.

You and other religious people take thousand year old material that you have no idea where it came from or who wrote it and hold it to be the sacred word of god that can't be changed or questioned. I have one word, GULLIBLE.



TMB:I responded: Ouchie.



Kristin Nash answered:

That is all you have to say. I must say I am disappointed. I was impressed with your ability to back up most of your controversial arguments, but now I am questioning your skills. Could it be that this somewhat of an intelligent person has come to realize she has been brainwashed by a cult that preys on gullible people?

Note the "somewhat intelligent person", although I don't agree with all your beliefs, an intelligent person will be able to argue any topic. The reason I say somewhat is due to the fact you ruined your winning streak by promoting brainwashing and replying with Ouchie.



TMB:I responded: What?



Kristin did respond, but alas, I accidentally deleted the e-mail.

I hope that your call for assistance doesn't go unanswered. A few rounds as some hulking pituitary case's punching bag should get you started. But, don't limit yourself--you CAN have everything you want. By the time your routine beatings induce kidney failure and blindness, you should be completely help finding the man for the job, I hear that prisoner pen pals do pretty well in this regard.

Best of luck to you, and well done.



TMB:I responded: Do you feel better now?



"Risia Skye" answered:

Ah, witty repartee. What dazzling command of the language! (I don't suppose you'll add "I know you are, but what am I?" by any chance?)

Yes, I do feel better. But I always "feel better" than you, in both respects.

It is easy to feel superior to one so consumed by interest in breeding and in mocking the petty life struggles of the ignorant. Why not hunt more challenging prey? Won't your oft-mentioned intellect protect you? You could be adding something new to any number of ongoing debates, but instead you recycle a lot of tired stereotyping rhetoric. It's sad, and more than a little pathetic, to see talent wasted because of immaturity and a lousy disposition.

And, I don't waste nearly as much time being consumed with hate and "poor little me" post-adolescent angst, which leaves me more time to work, study, have sex, form relationships, and achieve. These things bring me joy, which your life seems (if your blanket generalizations and constant complaints are any indication) to lack.



TMB:I responded: You seem to be filled with anger, and you appear to have much to prove. Do you feel better NOW? If not, I'm here for you.



"Risia Skye" answered:

I do indeed. Thank you for adding your version of "I know you are, but what am I?" to the exchange. I did not anticipate that you would actually meet this request. Nothing could have made me feel better. I'm glad to know that you're there for my amusement.



TMB:I responded: Some people claim that being ignored is worse than being insulted. What do you think of that theory?



"Risia Skye" answered:

You're absolutely right: I am being judgemental, yet still responding. I wouldn't bother if I didn't respect you (or the version of you which appears on your site) enough to think it might be enjoyable.

Bitch,

This is regarding the 'stupid people' section of your page. I have to admit, I enjoyed the senseless bashing of that teen mother that keeps writing you. The stuff she comes out with is pretty pathetic (although her point about your readers not thinking she is real is a good one).

Anyway (and I'll try not to make any grammatical errors) if you're so bitchy about the world and most of the things in it, why don't you do something productive about it? The site's great, whatever, but if this stuff really bothers you the way you make us think it does, then get out there and be productive. Putting sarcastic comments after every line of Lucki's emails is not going to lower the rate of teen pregnancy. While it's entertaining, and I get that, I'm sure your readers would have a lot more respect for you if you showed that you're invovled with groups/organizations/anything. Unless you just enjoy being a bitch. In that case, keep it up.

One more thing, the less intelligent feedback you get often requires more intelligent responses. As a frequent visitor to your site, I'm only saying that spelling errors aren't that entertaining. You get your point across much better when you stick to the subject.

On a positive note, I enjoyed your article 'i respect your feelings as a woman and a human'. I am male, but I try to see the subject objectively. My girlfriend is taking a lot of women's studies courses and I've learned recently that the not-butch feminists actually have a respectable doctrine, however you make a good point.



TMB: I responded with: Nothing. I suspect that's why he wrote back two days later, clearly upset that I didn't consider his e-mail worthy of a response.



Tim Palko wrote:

and i quote..

Teen mother:

"What makes you so sure that he is going to be a criminal. Just because the statistic's say that doesn't mean it is going to be true. statistic's don't apply to everyone. You don't know me. How do you know if I am good or bad parent? Just because I am a teen doesn't make me a bad parent. I do agree that there are a lot of teen parents out there that are bad parents but I also know that they are not all bad. My cousin was a child born to a teen mom and he is 25 now and never once gotten into any kind of legal trouble. He is an A student and got a full scholarship to a very good college. So not all babies or teen parents are going to be teen parents themselves or criminals. "

You:

"It's a sure bet that the offspring of a girl who doesn't know how to properly use apo's'trophe's' will become a criminal. "

Me:

Dodging the bullet there, eh? I see you doing that quite a bit with these teen moms. Your quote, which is at best taken as sarcasm, has no relevance to this girl's point. Yeah, teen mom's suck. In fact, most moms suck. I'm completely dissatisfied with parenting in today's world. But she's right when she says that you don't know her. You are grouping all teen moms together, and all she is asking is that you change your tone. Whether you do or not, whatever, but please address the point, not the grammar. If I thought myself more observant, I'd say this teen pregnancy thing was getting to you.



TMB: I responded with: It's called "humor." Some people seem to dig it.



Tim Palko wrote:

Oh, silly me. I was looking on a controversial web site for some intelligent debates.

Sometimes it's hard to tell what you call humor from what looks like sarcasm. Sarcasm is often used to dodge the point, but I stand corrected.

TMB: I responded with: Tsk, tsk. Someone takes the Internet a little too seriously.



Tim Palko wrote:

The bitch has nerve. The internet is your life.

I look at your website and see someone who has nothing better to do than criticize people who don't have the intelligence to defend themselves. There's a hobby.

You deal with some serious issues, yes I'm going to take it seriously.

Your site has only two things. Intelligent articles and cheap laughs.

I think it would be unfortunate if your readers were only looking for a cheap laugh.



TMB: I responded with: You found me out. The Internet is my life. How ever will I survive knowing that someone has discovered my dirty secret?



Tim Palko wrote:

Oh, come on! You discourage feedback, and this is why. Your responses are disappointing.

Why post your email address on your site? You get insults and bash people. You get compliments and bash people. Being able to predict your responses, I can't even think of anything to write without sounding like all the other people you bash on your site.

Your online personality continues to fascinate me. You portray an attitude of complete apathy for everything, and yet you seem to care enough to dedicate a web site to it. The only reason you get out of bed in the morning, besides whatever smartass answer you have, is knowing you piss people off every day. Stepping on the people that admire you, brushing away the people that hate you. I don't think

I've ever seen you give a straight answer to anything. Have you? I'd really like to see it. A quote elsewhere on the internet, maybe?

I doubt your offline personality is anything like this, but I'm curious.



TMB: I responded with: Don't you find it amusing that this pisses you off?



Tim Palko wrote:

Actually, no, because it doesn't. I won't hold your misobservation against you as email is a poor transmitter of emotion, but I'm sure you amused yourself with this comment. (pat yourself on the back)

Before writing the last response, I was curious about your motive. Here I am, wondering why you won't entertain anyone's questions, why you won't give straight answers, why you continually attempt to piss anyone and everyone off.. I get it.

But the fact you think I'm pissed off ruins any sense of intimidation you're trying to pull. That was a bad call.

This isn't a complete waste of my time, however. I've learned that people like you should be ignored. For some reason, I've always known that, but found it hard to carry through. You're really good at pushing the buttons of teen-moms, but that's about it. And if you can't push my buttons, there are few people who can. Thanks anyway, you gave it your best.



TMB: I responded with: That you've continued to reply in length to my e-mails, even though I've not addressed your comments, shows how easily your buttons can be pushed. You don't agree?



Tim Palko wrote:

Why? I've been carrying on a one-sided conversation (which I'm ending) with what seems like a random quote generator.

My last email expressed my interest in how you handle your readers' feedback, but it seems you are beyond simple conversation.

If you have any interest in human contact, I'd like to exchange some *real* words, not this generic Eliza-like bs. Otherwise, be on your merry way.

Frankly, I'm disappointed that you can't see past the cloud of cynicism your website has created to meet someone who might have a lot in common with you.

Providing jack-off material for white misogynists since 1997.

The Misanthropic Bitch does not encourage feedback. All submissions, though, become property of the Misanthropic Bitch. Submissions may be published or reused in any other medium.